R'Biz
RSS Feed
 
A A A
Chesterfield Observer

HHHunt Pulls Plug

HHHunt pulls the plug for now on Branner Station/



Related Articles

More R'Biz »

Greg Pearson
Chesterfield Observer
Thursday, October 30, 2008

It could become a sign of the times -- HHHunt has suspended its plans to build Branner Station on 1,614 acres southeast of Chester. Just approved last year, Branner Station called for 2,449 single-family homes, 1,331 condos and townhouses, 908 apartments, 300 assisted living units and 470,000 square feet of office and retail development.

 

The zoning approval also called for HHHunt to build an offsite road network estimated to cost $130 million, including a north-south road connecting to Route 288 and an eastwest road to Interstate 95. Though developing the land has been delayed, the zoning for the development remains.

 

The Thomas Company LLC declined to extend HHHunt's contract to purchase the land.

 

"I don't think I can divulge what the landowner wants to do," said Sonny Currin speaking for Nina Shoosmith. "There are several options, but that hasn't been decided yet."

 

"We want to go and will go when we can, but we can't create a market out of nothing," said HHHunt Vice President/General Manager Dan Schmitt. "We hope to pick up the pieces and put the land contract back together in a couple of years.

 

"It's a combination of a housing slowdown and the credit crunch," Schmitt continued. "It's illogical to put your head down and move ahead. We've put three years, lots of engineering and money into the project, so we're committed to see our vision of Branner Station through. We hope they believe we're the best alternative."

 

Bermuda Supervisor Dorothy Jaeckle declined to speculate on what might happen to the property, but did say, "There's going to be a hefty [property] tax bill to pay. It's not the same market as three years ago."

 

Selling the property as one development might be difficult because the proffers include building roads in phases as the development progresses.

 

Check out more stories in this edition of the Chesterfield Observer, now a weekly publication.  

 

Printer Friendly Version  Email Article to a Friend  RSS Feeds


2 comments.
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Good comments by Doug. Chesterfield is a great place to live. I want to see more mixed use development (homes/retail/offices).
Redevelop Hull Street, there are lots of vacant space from Chippenham to Genito Road. Create an enterprise zone with no taxes, low interest business loans/grants, and enhance the areas with landscape improvements (flowers, flowering bushes, clean streets/sidewalks, meeting areas, good lighting).


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

It is sad to see this project not move forward. Hopefully, it will in the future. I just hope it isn't the County's desire to drive commercial development once again out of the Chesterfield and into the City and Henrico. Watkins Center is a step in the right direction but the proffers required to be paid by developers like HHHunt just get passed down to the residential home owner making it more expensive to buy a home. While I agree that a developer should have pay for some infrastructure, schools, etc., I don't think it is fair to make them pay for it all when it just gets passed down to you and me. There has to be a better way to balance growth and infrastructure. The County should like to be a partner with intelligent developers wiht good projects. I don't want to see Chesterfield turn into Western Henrico which is slowly devolving into post hayday Cloverleaf Mall but I would like to see more of the large mixed communities in our area. They are vital to generating new jobs, bringing retail and commercial centers to Chesterfield County. Hull Street is turning into a disaster and will be a mirror image of Midlothian Turnpike if they don't stop building strip mall after strip mall along this cooridor. The days of the giant subdivisions full of nothing but 3,000+ square foot homes are behind us. Empty nesters aren't looking for condos. They want smaller, high end energy efficient ranchers. Just because a house is small doesn't mean it cannot be incredibly nice. Small yards that require only minimal maintenance with great public common areas within communities are what my parents aer interested in. I would love to see a community with all sorts of options - apartments, start homes, large family homes and retirement mini palaces with a nice mix of restaurants, medical office and out patient services, hotels, etc. I hope HHHunt moves forward on this project in the future but I would like to see it redesigned to include more commercial and less residential homes. It would be nice to see the County pick up the tab for at least half of the cost of the expressway instead of making the developer pay for the entire costs as well all know those costs will just be passed down to you and I. More commercial development would add dramatically to the County's tax base and revenue. Chesterfield has virtually zero service hotels and desperately needs them. If the expressway could be built, I think you would see hotels, medical office and retail flock to this site. However, the County needs to think outside the box and be more of a partner with developers rather than a regulator. If everyone is vested in a project and has something to lose, they generally turn out pretty darn well. In any event, I hope the project moves forward one day but perhaps in a different shape or form that its current proposal.



Name: *
E-Mail:
URL:
Comment: *
What is 2 + 2? *
To help protect against spam, please answer the above question

  

Disclaimer: Richmond.com reserves the right to edit and/or publish your contributions via e-mail, story comments, etc. Inappropriate comments will be subject to immediate removal without notice.