Education

Bible School?

New religion course brings the Bible to classrooms in Chesterfield County Public Schools.

Bible School?
Photo illustration by Lisa Billings
Students at Cosby, Clover Hill and Matoaca high schools will have the option of taking a comparative religions course as an elective this fall.

Related Articles

More Education »

Donna Gregory
Chesterfield Observer
Wednesday, July 09, 2008

The Bible will be one of the religious texts taught at three county high schools this fall with the introduction of a new comparative religions course.

 

The course is the first time a religion-based option is being offered in county schools. It will be available as a single-semester elective to students at Cosby, Clover Hill and Matoaca high schools.

 

The course offering was prompted by a group of parents and educators who asked the school board last year to consider implementing a Bible-based curriculum. Some members of that same group had previously asked the school system to teach intelligent design as an alternative theory to evolution.

 

"Upon hearing requests that certain religious studies be included as part of the division's course offerings, [Superintendent] Dr. Newsome assigned staff members responsible for the development of curriculum the task of considering the addition of religious content courses to the division's academic program," explained Tim Bullis, the school system's director of community relations.

 

"This assignment resulted in the determination that CCPS [Chesterfield County Public Schools] will be offering a comparative religions class as a high school elective beginning this fall," Bullis said. "Comparative religions, rather than a Bible course, will be offered because of the system's lack of experience in teaching any type of high school religion course."

 

One school board member sees this course as the beginning of a Bible curriculum in county classrooms. "I think this country was founded on religious beliefs, and I feel it's appropriate for our kids to be taught the basic principles that the Bible teaches. I think the comparative religions course is the first step," said Matoaca School Board member Omarh Rajah.

 

"There's certain things that the government says you should do, but there's the right, moral thing that has to be done, and the federal government has been wrong many times before…It's time that we restore moral values and principles back to our kids' lives," continued Rajah.

 

But Marshall Trammell Jr., Bermuda school board member, is much more cautious on the issue. "This is a prudent step for us, but as a board, we have not discussed moving this forward into a Bible class. Some individual members may want to do that, but as a board, we have not discussed moving in that direction."

 

In the past, Trammell has expressed concern over bringing religion to the classroom. "I prefer my religion to be taught at home, church and Sunday school," said Trammell during an interview last week.

 

School administrators also remain cautious on whether the comparative religions course might one day be expanded to include a class in just the Bible. "We're open to the possibility," said Dr. Dale Kalkofen, assistant superintendent for instructional support.

 

"We haven't ruled out teaching [the] Bible in the future," said Bullis.

 

School systems can offer courses in religion, but it's illegal for teachers to prophesize and express their own personal religious beliefs in the classroom. Courses must be taught from a purely academic standpoint and usually mirror similar classes offered at the college level.

 

According to Bullis, the comparative religions course being offered will survey "the basic elements and historical developments of world religions. After establishing a common definition of the purpose of religion and ways to study religion, students study Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Other religions are studied as time and interest permit."

 

The course will be taught by certified social studies teachers.

 

Check out more stories in this edition of the Chesterfield Observer, now a weekly publication.


Printer Friendly Version  Email Article to a Friend  RSS Feeds


13 comments.
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

I can only imagine what magical, faith-based "history" is being taught in this class. Will they talk of the Spanish Inquisition, or the Counter-Enlightenment Movement, or the persecution of Muslims and Jews, or witches being burned, or the KKK burning crosses in a backwoods attempt to "enforce" the bible, or the torturing of heretics throughout time, or Satanism, or I could go on forever?
Perhaps opponents are afraid to talk about "god". Perhaps supporters are afraid to talk about things done in the name of "god". Perhaps Chesterfield County can get away with teaching the Bible, as long as they call it "comparable religion". Perhaps.


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

I totally agree with you Jessica. Every since religion was taken out of the schools our kids have revert to killing one another, dealing with drugs, alcohol, etc. I don't understand how some people can oppose having religion taught in schools but yet it's okay for our kids to look at MTV and BET all day. It's the norm nowadays for girls to be kissing girls and boys to be kissing boys. Some of these kids need some Jesus in their life.


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

We already teach kids the religion of man-made Global Warming...what's the harm in teaching about another subject that has absolutely no evidence of its actual existence?


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Did any of you who think that it will be christianity forced down kids throats read the following section of the article?

"After establishing a common definition of the purpose of religion and ways to study religion, students study Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Other religions are studied as time and interest permit."

I agree that this should be taught sensatively in that no religion should be communicated as the "correct" religion but what is the harm in having it as an elective? High School electives are available so that students get a taste of what their passion may be later in life, be it art, music, computer science, etc. Many kids these days do not live in a family atmosphere that promotes the study of religion and taking them to Temple or Church is not their lifestyle choice.

Why take a way an opportunity for kids to find their passion?


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Keep religion out of school. Jessica, not everyone reads the Bible, wants to or is the same faith you seem to be. Even though the Constituion was written by Christian men, times change. We have more diversity in religion now than ever and cramming one religion down kids' throats is the same thing Islam does in the Middle East. Keep religion as an optional class.


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Awesome! When we took prayer and Bible out of schools our kids went downhill completely. The Constitution absolutely was prepared by CHRISTIAN men who's Christian faith was screaming throughout the Constitution. It was their "guide". I think kids need to know that. What they do with it is up to them. Why is it okay to shield them from their true history just because God was the Major motivation of our founding fathers speeches and writings in forming a new nation "Under God". History is fact regardless of what we want it to be. My kids will be thrilled!


WOW - Email this User
8/8/2008 at 1:24:55 PM
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Kids are taught so many other insignificant things. Why is it so bad to be taught about Religeon. What scares you negative people about learning about God? And what makes a high school teacher and less knowlegable than a College professor?


KA - Email this User
8/2/2008 at 1:46:41 PM
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Is this just an attempt to force Christianity down kid's throats? Or to condemn other religions as false?
What is the true purpose and who will teach this course? Someone unbiased???


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Intelligent Design and the Bible would be the best thing I can imagine being taught in Chesterfield County. Please consider Thomasdale High School!!!


Dave - Email this User
7/10/2008 at 12:57:10 PM
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Horray! If presented in an unbiased way, a course like this could be the first time students get an in depth look at something other than Christianity; the first time they get to compare what they may have been raised in to what some other kids may have been raised in. How can that be bad? It can be bad if it's biased. Ironically, it seems the best qualifed teachers for such a course would be athiests >> not "captured" by any of the religions being compared.


oldhick - Email this User
7/10/2008 at 7:54:07 AM
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

My only question would be "why"? As our math and science skills continue to trail behind the rest of the worlds, is comparative religion really necessary? These types of curriculum's are fantastic at a collegiate level, but this just seems pathetic for high school. Who really believes that a high school teacher is going to be able to teach comparative religion with any sense of scope, history, or objectivity? Its always great to needlessly stir up controversy. As usual, thank you for wasting our money and our time.


wtf - Email this User
7/9/2008 at 7:18:44 PM
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

neither God nor Christianity are mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.

and the "...Government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion...." - the Treaty of Tripoly, conducted under the authority of George Washington and by the Senate under the leadership of John Adams,
the second president.

Omarh may need to do a little more reading especially if he's going to be making decisions on my kids' education


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Big waste of taxpayer dollars. Religion should be taught in church or college, not in the county public education system.



Name: *
E-Mail:
URL:
Comment: *
What is 2 + 2? *
To help protect against spam, please answer the above question

  

Disclaimer: Richmond.com reserves the right to edit and/or publish your contributions via e-mail, story comments, etc. Inappropriate comments will be subject to immediate removal without notice.